Pages

Saturday, June 06, 2026

Knicks Stun Spurs to Take 2-0 NBA Finals Lead

In a contentious and physical game during which each team enjoyed a double digit lead, the New York Knicks beat the San Antonio Spurs 105-104 thanks to a Jalen Brunson free throw followed by Victor Wembanyama's missed jump shot. The Knicks shot worse than .420 from the field for the second consecutive game (37-89, .416) but they outrebounded the Spurs 44-42, they beat the Spurs in second chance points 14-9, and they narrowly won the turnover battle (16-15) in a game during which every possession mattered. The Knicks have won 13 consecutive playoff games, the second longest postseason winning streak in NBA history, trailing only the 15 game winning streak authored by the 2017 Golden State Warriors

Karl-Anthony Towns led the Knicks with 21 points on 8-12 field goal shooting plus a game-high 13 rebounds. He also had four assists, and a game-high tying +11 plus/minus number. He found an excellent balance of attacking the hoop, stretching the defense (he shot 3-5 from beyond the arc), and picking apart the Spurs' defense with pinpoint passing. His combination of size, strength, and agility flustered Wembanyama.

Game one hero Jalen Brunson contributed 20 points, a game-high tying six assists, five rebounds, and a game-high five steals. He shot just 7-25 from the field and had a game-high tying four turnovers, but he had a team-high seven fourth quarter points as the Knicks scored just enough to hold off the surging Spurs, who won the fourth quarter 29-21. Brunson had a -10 plus/minus number.

The oft-criticized Mikal Bridges made his impact felt all over the court with 20 points on 8-13 field goal shooting, six rebounds, and a game-high tying six assists. The Knicks' other double figure scorers were OG Anunoby (17 points, four rebounds, three assists, two blocked shots) and Landry Shamet (13 points, +9 plus/minus number). Jose Alvorado shot 0-4 from the field but he contributed three rebounds and two assists in 10 minutes while matching Towns' game-high +11 plus/minus number.

Wembanyama overcame a sluggish first half (seven points on 2-4 field goal shooting) to finish with a game-high 29 points on 11-21 field goal shooting plus a team-high tying nine rebounds, and a game-high four blocked shots; however, his late game lapses--including a careless turnover followed by fouling Brunson for what turned out to be the game-winning free throw--will be the most indelible images of his performance, along with his missed jump shot in the waning seconds. He had a game-high tying four turnovers.

De'Aaron Fox had 20 points on 8-12 field goal shooting, five assists and a game-high tying four turnovers. This was his first game with at least 20 points since he scored 21 points in San Antonio's 139-109 game six series-clinching win over Minnesota on May 15. Dylan Harper had a very good game off of the bench: 15 points on 6-12 field goal shooting, six rebounds, and a game-high +12 plus/minus number in 32 minutes. The Spurs need more from Stephon Castle, who scored 14 points on 5-14 field goal shooting with four assists, a game-high tying four turnovers, and a -6 plus/minus number. Devin Vassell filled up the boxscore with 14 points on 4-9 field goal shooting, a team-high tying nine rebounds, five assists, and no turnovers.

In the first quarter, the Spurs aggressively drove to the hoop to score, and to pass to open shooters when the defense collapsed. This attacking mentality put a lot of pressure on the Knicks to defend against the drive, recover to perimeter shooters, and still be mindful of Wembanyama's looming presence as a potential driver, cutter, lob threat, and offensive rebounder. Near the end of the first quarter, Wembanyama faked a three pointer, and then drove to the hoop for a layup, but overall--as ABC/ESPN game analysts Richard Jefferson and Tim Legler both noted--he "drifted" to the perimeter too much in the first half. The Spurs led 34-25 after the first 12 minutes. Fox scored nine first quarter points, which is more than he scored in all of game one (seven points on 3-13 field goal shooting). Julian Champagnie, who did not score in the final three quarters, had eight first quarter points.

In addition to their efficient first quarter shooting (13-20, .650), the Spurs applied relentless pressure against New York's ballhandlers to slow down the game, drain the shot clock, and disrupt New York's offensive rhythm. The Knicks shot 8-21 (.381) from the field in the first quarter, and seemed to be hanging on for dear life--but the Knicks turned things around in the second quarter, outscoring the Spurs 31-18, utilizing a stifling defense that held the Spurs to 4-21 (.190) field goal shooting. The Knicks ended the first half with a flurry: Bridges nailed a corner three pointer after excellent ball movement to trim San Antonio's lead to 48-47, and then Shamet drove to the hoop to give the Knicks their first lead of the game, 49-48, at the 3:39 mark. Vassell answered with a four point play, but then the Knicks scored the final seven points of the half on a Brunson layup, a Bridges floater off of a deft feed from Towns, and a Towns three pointer from the left corner. The Knicks were up 56-52 at halftime after trailing by as much as 12 points in the second quarter. 

During the halftime show, ABC/ESPN commentators Charles Barkley and Shaquille O'Neal debated if Wembanyama was "in shock" (Barkley) or just not playing with enough energy (O'Neal). Wembanyama had a big third quarter (12 points on 5-8 field goal shooting), but the Knicks used a balanced attack to outscore the Spurs 28-23 to carry an 84-75 advantage into the final stanza.

It looked like the Knicks had knocked out the Spurs after Anunoby's driving dunk over Wembanyama put the Knicks up 97-83 at the 6:04 mark of the fourth quarter--the Knicks' biggest lead of the game--but the Spurs answered with a 14-0 run in the next 3:05. During that stretch, the Knicks' offense looked disjointed, and their usually stout defense crumbled. The Knicks had overcome a 14 point third quarter deficit to win game one, and it seemed as if the Spurs were about to return the favor--but the Knicks are a very resilient team. After the Spurs tied the score, the Knicks' ensuing possession ended with an out of bounds call in favor of the Spurs, but after a coach's challenge the call was reversed to a proximate foul on Champagnie as Anunoby attempted a three point shot. Anunoby made all three free throws to end the Spurs' run and put the Knicks up, 100-97. Those were the Knicks' first free throws in the second half. Some players and teams waste energy focusing on which fouls are called or not called, but the Knicks stay focused on playing. 

After the teams traded baskets, the Knicks had a strange possession in which Brunson never touched the ball while Bridges dribbled the clock down before turning the ball over. The Spurs then took a 104-102 lead on Wembanyama's three point play with 57.3 seconds remaining. Brunson's patented fadeaway jumper tied the score at 104 at the 39.3 second mark. Wembanyama and Brunson each missed jumpers on the next two possessions, with Wembanyama rebounding Brunson's shot with 11.8 seconds remaining and the score still tied at 104. Wembanyama started to dribble up the court and then made an outlet pass that hit Castle in the back. Brunson snatched the loose ball, and Wembanyama compounded his mistake by fouling Brunson at midcourt. Brunson split the free throws, and the Spurs called their final timeout with 7.5 seconds left. The Spurs' last play involved Fox catching the ball in the middle of the court, hesitating before driving, and then dishing to Wembanyama for a jump shot. Wembanyama missed, and time ran out before the Spurs could retrieve the ball or commit a foul to stop the clock. ABC/ESPN commentator Kenny Smith correctly pointed out that the Spurs would have been better served to attack more quickly on their final possession so that even if they missed a shot they would have time to go for an offensive rebound or at least commit a foul to stop the clock and have one more possession trailing by one, two, or three (depending on how many free throws the Knicks made after the foul).

The Spurs' 14-0 fourth quarter run proved to be too little, too late; during the first two games they have played very well at times, but too often they have hurt themselves with a combination of passivity and mental errors. Of course, the Knicks deserve a tremendous amount of credit for pressuring the Spurs enough to make the Spurs uncomfortable and error-prone. In game one, Brunson (13 fourth quarter points) and Anunoby (12 fourth quarter points) took over late to lead the Knicks to victory; this game two win gives the Knicks a commanding advantage because no team that lost the first two NBA Finals games at home has come back to win the championship.

6 comments:



  1. Marcel

    I picked the knicks in six



    For a couple reasons david


    The knicks are veterans who understand how to win .

    The spurs are too dependent on outside shot. Wemby doesn't play in the post enough

    Also Mike Brown, Jalen brunson, Josh Hart, kat all been thrown away and doubted. I think that plays a part too they mindset


    But it reminds me of the 2011 Mavericks.


    Peja, terry, kids, marion. Tyson chandler, deshawn Stevenson etc all hit timely shots. They played great defense and understood how to win and was vets.

    Bridges, shamet, og, Hart, Alvarado doing the same

    Also they best player is kat not brunson, kat at his apex is close to elite he just hasn't put it all together

    ReplyDelete
  2. Marcel:

    It is more impressive to pick the Knicks in six before the series, not when they are up 2-0.

    The Spurs ranked 16th (out of 30 teams) in three point field goals made during the regular season (13.6 per game). During the playoffs they rank fifth out of 16 teams in three point field goals made per game (12.7), but the Knicks rank third (13.1) with a lower 3FG%. I don't think that overly relying on the three point shot is the difference between the Knicks and the Spurs in two Finals games that could have easily gone the other way. I agree with you that Wembanyama shoots too many three pointers.

    I'm not sure about the comparison with the 2011 Mavericks. Dirk Nowitzki outdueled a Heat team featuring LeBron, Wade, and Bosh. With all due respect to Brunson and Towns, neither is as good as prime Dirk Nowitzki. Every championship team has players who hit timely shots and play great defense.

    ReplyDelete
  3. To be fair, Dirk didn't exactly play that well in the 2011 Finals, and Wade was probably the best player in that series. If Dirk's name was Kobe Bryant while shooting 9-27 in game 6, he would get almost no credit for the title, except now he gets way too much credit. He was obviously the Mavs best player. But the Mavs primarily won because of these 2 reasons: James almost completely checked out and then choked, and Jason Terry(a role bench player) outplayed James for much of the series. These are 2 very extremes that the Mavs needed to barely win a very competitive series.

    The Knicks/Spurs are both very good teams, but neither would be winning titles most years. Brunson has basically had 1 good quarter out of 8. The Spurs have likely lost their window to win the series now. Wemby has been the best player in the series and the obvious best player overall of anyone in the Finals. This series so far has been a rare case where the role players are actually making a big difference as the Knicks role players have been much better so far. Also, the Knicks 2nd best player(probably Brunson, maybe KAT) is much better than the Spurs 2nd best player.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous:

    You are correct that Kobe did not receive the credit that he should receive, but that does not mean we should make the same mistake with Dirk.

    This is my analysis right after the 2011 Finals ended:

    " Nowitzki earned the NBA Finals MVP by averaging 26.0 ppg, 9.7 rpg and 2.0 apg while shooting .416 from the field, .368 from three point range and a mind boggling .978 (45-46) from the free throw line but those numbers do not fully explain or properly quantify the way that Nowitzki controlled the series, particularly his repeated fourth quarter dominance in one of the most closely contested championship battles in NBA history; three of the six games were not decided until the final buzzer and Dallas won two of those contests as a direct result of Nowitzki's clutch play. Nowitzki totaled 62 fourth quarter points during the series, duplicating the combined output of Miami's LeBron James and Dwyane Wade; Nowitzki shot 18-35 from the field (.514) and 24-24 from the free throw line in those pivotal fourth quarters, while James and Wade shot 23-50 from the field (.460) and 11-14 from the free throw line (.786). "

    I am not going to compare the 2026 Finals after two games to completed versions of the NBA Finals for the past 70-plus years, but I would argue that it is premature to say that the Knicks or Spurs would not win titles most years. The Spurs won 60-plus regular season games. The Knicks are enjoying one of the most dominant postseason runs in NBA history. Either team will be a worthy champion. You don't have to be as great as the 2000s Lakers, 90s Bulls, 80s Lakers/Celtics/76ers or 60s Celtics to be a worthy champion.

    Towns is averaging 19.5 ppg/12.5 rpg/4.0 apg with shooting splits of .556/.429/1.000. Wembanyama is averaging 27.5 ppg/10.5 rpg/2.0 apg with shooting splits of .405/.267/.810. The eye test tells us that Towns is winning the matchup, and those numbers support what the eye test says.

    ReplyDelete



  5. Marcel

    The knicks is clutch, so was 2011 mavs


    Mavs best player shot bad

    Knicks best scorer shot bad

    But both made clutch shots in 4th

    They role players we're inconsistent in reg season but played great in postseason

    They made a lot of end of shot clock shots as well

    ReplyDelete
  6. Marcel:

    We don't yet know who the 2026 NBA champion will be, so it is premature to compare the 2026 Knicks with the 2011 Mavs in terms of being a clutch team. The Spurs came back from down 3-2 to eliminate the defending NBA champion on the defending NBA champion's homecourt in the Western Conference Finals. If the Spurs win the NBA Finals 4-2 maybe the Spurs are the 2006 Heat and the Knicks are the 2006 Mavs. I prefer to let things play out and analyze after the fact.

    A major difference between the 2011 Mavs and the 2026 Knicks is that Dirk is on a higher level historically than any player on the Knicks. If the Knicks win the championship, a more apt comparison might be the 2004 Pistons, who won the NBA title with several very good players but no player who is even close to top 20-30 all-time. Dirk is in the top 30 at worst, and I am not sure that any Knick is in the top 100 all-time.

    ReplyDelete