20 Second Timeout is the place to find the best analysis and commentary about the NBA.

Saturday, April 16, 2022

2021-2022 Playoff Predictions

The final composition of the playoff field was not determined until the NBA completed its Play-In Tournament early this morning, with the Brooklyn Nets and Atlanta Hawks claiming the final two playoff spots in the East, and the Minnesota Timberwolves and New Orleans Pelicans earning the final two playoff spots in the West; I correctly picked three of the four Play-In Tournament qualifiers, but I had Minnesota eighth behind the L.A. Clippers, who ended up losing to both Minnesota and New Orleans.

Before we look ahead to the playoffs, here is a brief look back at the 2021-2022 season.

The L.A. Lakers were stunningly bad, not only falling short of championship expectations but failing to qualify for the Play-In Tournament. The Brooklyn Nets navigated a challenging season during which Kevin Durant missed 27 games, Kyrie Irving missed most of the team's home games due his refusal to receive a COVID-19 vaccine--which placed him in violation of New York City's vaccine mandate, which has now been lifted for athletes and entertainers--and James Harden openly quit before being reunited with Daryl Morey, who insists that Harden is a better scorer than Michael Jordan. For the most part, the Milwaukee Bucks avoided a championship hangover, and they are well-positioned to defend their crown. The Phoenix Suns started slowly (2-3) in the wake of their Finals loss to the Bucks, but the Suns finished with a league-best 64-18 record.

It will be interesting to see who is crowned as the regular season MVP. Three candidates stand out above the rest (listed in alphabetical order):

Two-time regular season MVP Giannis Antetokounmpo, coming off of his first championship and first Finals MVP, authored another spectacular season (career-high 29.9 ppg, 11.6 rpg, 5.8 apg, .553 FG%) while leading Milwaukee to the third seed in the Eastern Conference.

Reigning regular season MVP Nikola Jokic also had a fantastic season (career-high 27.1 ppg, career-high 13.8 rpg, 7.9 apg, career-high .583 FG%), becoming the first player in NBA history to have at least 2000 points (2004), at least 1000 rebounds (1019), and at least 500 assists (584) in the same season (to be fair, Wilt Chamberlain missed out on this distinction by just eight points in 1968 and by 44 points in 1967, two seasons during which he had over 1900 rebounds). Jokic joined pro basketball's "Five-Tool Club," the elite group of players (Julius Erving, Dave Cowens, Scottie Pippen, Tracy McGrady, Kevin Garnett) who led their teams in scoring, rebounding, assists, steals, and blocked shots in the same season.

Joel Embiid, who openly campaigned for the MVP award throughout the season, won his first scoring title with a career-high 30.6 ppg while also grabbing 11.7 rpg and dishing for 4.2 apg. 

The historical standard is that an NBA MVP must play in at least 85% of the scheduled games, which adds up to at least 70 games in the traditional 82 game season. Bill Walton is the only regular season MVP in NBA history who played less than 85% of his team's games. In fact, 19 MVPs played all 82 games, 11 MVPs played in 81 games, and five MVPs played in 80 games (also, Karl Malone played 49 of 50 games in the lockout-shortened 1999 season). I miss the days before "load management"! If the 70 games played threshold still matters to the MVP voters, then Jokic (74 games played) prevails over Embiid--who played in a career-high 68 games--and Antetokounmpo, who played in 67 games.

Then, there is the curious case of Devin Booker. Prior to this season, Booker never received a single MVP vote--not even for fifth place, let alone first place--and he never made the All-NBA First, Second, or Third Team; he played for losing teams in the first five seasons of his career, and then he has been overshadowed--at least in mainstream media narratives--by Chris Paul during the past two seasons when the Suns became a winning team. This is the fifth straight season that Booker has averaged at least 24 ppg and at least 4 apg, but only in the past month or so have a few media members suddenly begun mentioning him as a possible MVP candidate, noting that every player who averaged at least 25 ppg and at least 5 apg for a team that posted a winning percentage above .700 won the MVP (Booker narrowly missed that arbitrary statistical combo platter this season, averaging a career-high 26.8 ppg plus 4.8 apg). It is doubtful that a Booker for MVP campaign would ever gain widespread traction among media members/"stat gurus," because that would destroy the 15 year old narrative regarding Paul's value based on "advanced basketball statistics": media members who bought the preposterous notion that Paul was more valuable that Kobe Bryant in 2008 are not going to pick Devin Booker over Paul in 2021. For the record, this season Booker played in 68 games, and Paul played in 65 games.

My general take on MVP criteria has been consistent: the MVP should go to the best all-around player in the league, with the only exception being if there is a dominant big man who is having the most impact even though he is not the best all-around player (for example, Shaquille O'Neal deserved several MVP awards based on his dominance, even though he was not the best all-around player). The MVP should play at least 70 games in an 82 game season (or the proportional equivalent if the season is shortened), and ideally the MVP should be from a team with a winning record--but the most deserving candidate should not be punished because of the ineptitude of his teammates, nor should the most deserving candidate be overlooked if he is blessed with talented teammates.

Jokic is the only credible MVP candidate who played in at least 70 games this season, so if we stick strictly to 70 games played as a minimum for MVP consideration then that would not only mean that he wins but that Antetokounmpo, Embiid, and Booker are not eligible for the top five; the odious emergence of "load management" may require a less stringent application of the 70 games played standard to avoid selecting an MVP who did not have an MVP-caliber season: this season only 45 NBA players played at least 70 games.

Antetokounmpo is the best all-around player in the NBA, and has been for the past several years; his main advantage over Jokic is that he is a better and more versatile defensive player. That being said, Jokic has had such an exceptional season that I cannot disagree with anyone who votes for him. Embiid is less consistent and less versatile than both Antetokounmpo and Jokic, so Embiid would not be any higher than third on my MVP ballot.

There is a significant gap this season between the top three and the remaining candidates; there are several players who deserve serious consideration for fourth and fifth place, including (in alphabetical order) Booker, DeMar DeRozan (27.9 ppg, 5.2 rpg, 4.9 apg, 76 games played), Luka Doncic (28.4 ppg, 9.1 rpg, 8.7 apg, 65 games played), Rudy Gobert (15.6 ppg, 14.7 rpg, 2.1 bpg, 66 games played), and Jayson Tatum (26.9 ppg, 8.0 rpg, 4.4 apg, 76 games played). Doncic is the best all-around player in that group, and Tatum keyed Boston's second half of the season surge, so those would be my choices for fourth and fifth.

It will be interesting to watch the MVP candidates--and some other players who are often portrayed as MVP candidates--perform in the playoffs.

The following predictions are based on my analysis of what I expect to happen under ideal circumstances: in other words, if there are no further injuries and no COVID-19-related disruptions, which teams are most likely to win seven game playoff series? 

Here are my first round predictions:

Eastern Conference

#1 Miami (53-29) versus #8 Atlanta (43-39) 
 
The Heat made it to the NBA Finals just two years ago and they still have most of the same core players--including Jimmy Butler (21.4 ppg, 5.9 rpg, 5.5 apg), Tyler Herro (20.7 ppg, 5.0 rpg, 4.0 apg), and Bam Adebayo (19.1 ppg, 10.1 rpg)--yet they flew under the radar for most of the season as other teams (Brooklyn, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Golden State, L.A. Lakers) stole the headlines for various reasons. Other than Duncan Robinson and P.J. Tucker, none of the top players in the rotation played more than 68 games, yet when the dust cleared Miami had the best record in the East. The Heat are mediocre offensively--ranking 17th in scoring and 13th in field goal percentage--but they are elite defensively, ranking fourth in points allowed and fourth in defensive field goal percentage. They lack size and are vulnerable on the boards (ranking just 22nd in rebounds) but they play a smart, tough, and physical brand of basketball that should translate well in the playoffs. 

The Atlanta Hawks played Cinderella in last year's playoff ball and advanced to the Eastern Conference Finals, but the clock struck midnight early for them this season. The Hawks had to scramble just to get to 43 wins and squeeze into the Play-In Tournament, but then they blew out the Charlotte Hornets and came from behind to beat the Cleveland Cavaliers to earn the right to face the Heat. The Hawks have a top notch offense led by Trae Young (28.4 ppg, 9.7 apg), who became the only player other than Nate Archibald to lead the league in total points and total assists in the same season; Archibald won the scoring title and the assist title in 1972-73, while Young racked up the top totals mainly by playing 76 games while most of his rivals missed significant playing time, so Young did not lead the league in either category, finishing fourth in scoring and third in assists.

Miami won the season series 3-1, and Miami will win in six games.

#2 Boston (51-31) versus #7 Brooklyn (44-38)

The Celtics were just 21-22 on January 14, and Charles Barkley declared around that time that they should trade either Jayson Tatum or Jaylen Brown. Instead, the Celtics stood pat and went 30-9 the rest of the way, finishing the season as the top ranked team in both points allowed and defensive field goal percentage while also ranking fifth in rebounding and 12th in scoring. The first impression cast by the Celtics' slow start may be lingering in some people's minds, but the Celtics are a legitimate championship contender, and they have too much overall firepower for the Brooklyn Nets, who rely heavily on Kevin Durant and Kyrie Irving to score 70 or 80 points combined to cover up for the team's lack of depth and poor defense.

The Celtics have a championship recipe: two All-Star caliber players leading a deep and versatile roster that plays hard at both ends of the court. In contrast, and as I noted in my recap of Brooklyn's 115-108 Play-In Tournament win over Cleveland, the Nets' interior defense is not good, and their transition defense is awful. That is not a recipe for championship success. Could Ben Simmons make a difference for the Nets? There is speculation that Simmons may play in this series after sitting out all season, but even if he plays it is doubtful that a player who has missed so much time can make enough of an impact to change the direction of this series.

Durant and Irving will put up impressive individual numbers, but Boston will win in six games.

#3 Milwaukee (51-31) versus #6 Chicago (46-36)

It is not easy to win back to back titles. In the past 25 years, the only teams to accomplish this are the Shaquille O'Neal-Kobe Bryant Lakers in 2000-02, Bryant's 2009-10 Lakers, the LeBron James-Dwyane Wade 2012-13 Heat, and the Durant-led Warriors super-team that also had Stephen Curry (2017-18). Note that each of those squads had at least one member of the NBA's 75th Anniversary Team, and that Bryant is the only player in the past quarter century to win consecutive championships without playing alongside a Top 75 player. That puts into context both the significance of what the Bucks are trying to do and the historical level of greatness that Giannis Antetokounmpo will reach if he leads Milwaukee to the 2022 NBA championship.

The Bucks are not just a one man team, of course. Khris Middleton (20.1 ppg, 5.4 rpg, 5.4 apg) and Jrue Holiday (18.3 ppg, 4.5 apg, 6.8 apg) are two-way players who both made major contributions during last year's championship run and who both must play at a high level for Milwaukee to win the championship again. Bobby Portis provides physicality and three point shooting, while the healthy return of Brook Lopez late in the season should provide a significant boost at both ends of the court.

It is unusual for a defending champion that played well throughout the season to be so lightly regarded, but the Bucks have not been a popular pick for several years, and it is evident that even winning a championship did not convince some of the skeptics to change their views. I identified Antetokounmpo as a potential Pantheon level player at a time when many "experts" doubted that he could win a championship without leaving Milwaukee, and I expect him to win more than one NBA title.

I do not like the way that the Bucks rested their starters in the final game of the season to "clinch" the third seed instead of fighting for the second seed, but there is no denying that this looks like a great first round matchup for the Bucks (who may regret not having home court advantage in the second round if they face the Celtics). There was a lot of hype about the Chicago Bulls early in the season, but then the Bulls began to regress to the mean, a process hastened when injuries struck. Injuries impacted most teams this season--including Milwaukee--and the reality is that the Bulls are not good enough to contend for a championship as currently constructed, which takes nothing away from how well DeMar DeRozan performed.

I expect that the Bulls will play better in the playoffs than they have played recently and I think that the Bucks may relax after going up 2-0, but Milwaukee will win in six games.

#4 Philadelphia (51-31) versus #5 Toronto (48-34)

The 76ers supposedly tanked to the top, yet here they sit as the fourth seed with no championship rings since 1983. Joel Embiid's playoff resume is pretty thin and he tends to get hurt and/or fall off when the games really count, but unless he completely falls apart in the playoffs he will likely get a pass because he is playing alongside one of the all-time playoff chokers: James Harden. Get ready for those spectacular 5-17 games with eight turnovers and double digit negative plus/minus numbers, because Harden has been displaying playoff form even before the playoffs started: in his last 13 games he has shot better than .500 from the field one time while shooting .420 or worse from the field nine times, and in his most recent game versus Toronto he shot 3-12 from the field in a five point loss. The 76ers are 0-2 versus the Raptors since Harden joined the team, and he shot 5-12 from the field in the other loss. The 76ers are 1-3 versus the Raptors overall this season, so this is not a good matchup for Philadelphia, which will also be without the services of Matisse Thybulle in all of the games played in Toronto due to Thybulle's COVID-19 vaccination status. It is ironic that Harden sulked his way out of Brooklyn at least in part due to Kyrie Irving's vaccination status but now Irving is back in action and Harden's new team will be shorthanded in up to three games due to Thybulle's vaccination status.

The 76ers are very ordinary on both offense (ranking 16th in field goal percentage) and defense (ranking 15th in defensive field goal percentage). Embiid is an excellent rebounder, and Harden will do his part on the boards even when he is shooting bricks, but overall the 76ers rank 29th in rebounding.

This is not just about the 76ers' fascinating combination of arrogance and dysfunction; the Raptors are an excellent team that is very well-run by Masai Ujiri and very well-coached by Nick Nurse. The Raptors are not a flashy team and their statistical profile is not eye-catching, but they are very good at controlling the possession game, ranking eighth in rebounding, second in steals, and second in fewest turnovers committed. By placing such a high value on possession, they give themselves more of a margin for error on offense. The Raptors have a balanced offensive attack with four players averaging at least 17 ppg (Pascal Siakam, Fred VanVleet, Gary Trent Jr., OG Anunoby), plus rookie Scottie Barnes chipping in with 15.3 ppg.

Embiid will probably have at least one 40 point game in this series. Harden may have one or two 30 point games in this series. When it is all said and done, Embiid will be missing three pointers in crunch time, Harden will crumble into a brick laying turnover machine, and the 76ers will not be able to blame this on Ben Simmons, so Doc Rivers will probably be the scapegoat, paving the way for Daryl Morey and Harden to hire a new coach, and leaving Embiid to wonder what he did to deserve this fate. Toronto will win in six games.

Western Conference

#1 Phoenix (64-18) versus #8 New Orleans (36-46)

The Suns have been the best team in the league for most of the season. On paper, they have no weaknesses and they look like the team to beat, ranking fifth in scoring, first in field goal percentage, eighth in points allowed, third in defensive field goal percentage, and first in point differential. Devin Booker had an All-NBA First Team/fringe MVP caliber season (as discussed above), Chris Paul runs the show and makes timely midrange baskets, Deandre Ayton provides paint presence at both ends of the court, and the rest of the rotation players know their roles and execute at a very high level. Hall of Fame Coach Larry Brown always talks about "playing the right way," and this team takes that mantra to heart like few teams ever have. I did not expect the Suns to be quite this good, but I recognize greatness when I see it.

The Pelicans did well to sneak into the playoffs after a disastrous 3-14 start to the season, but they are completely outmatched in this series. The midseason acquisition of C.J. McCollum--who scored a team-high 24.3 ppg in 26 games with the Pelicans--gave the squad veteran presence and took a lot of pressure off of Brandon Ingram, who averaged 22.7 ppg in 55 games. The Pelicans are a sub-.500 team that ranked 23rd in field goal percentage and 24th in defensive field goal percentage, so let's not pretend that they can pose a serious threat to the Suns.

It is tempting to pick Phoenix to sweep, but even in the first round sweeps are not a given. Phoenix will win in five games.

#2 Memphis (56-26) versus #7 Minnesota (46-36)

The Memphis Grizzlies are the most surprising team of the 2022 season. I did not even pick them to make the playoffs, and most of my picks were correct even in the chaotic first season back to relative normalcy after two years of COVID-19-shortened seasons. I love not only Ja Morant's game but the way that he has elevated the entire franchise. The Grizzlies have a high-powered offense (ranking second in the league in scoring), and they display their athleticism not only at that end of the court but also on the boards (ranking eighth in rebounding) and on defense (ranking first in both steals and blocked shots, a rare combination). Morant is without question the team's best player, but Desmond Bane, Dillon Brooks, Steven Adams, and Jaren Jackson Jr. all make major contributions, plus the bench players showed that they can produce with or without Morant around to lead the way.

The Timberwolves are loaded with talent, and their high-powered offense led the league in scoring while also ranking first in three pointers made--but they ranked 22nd in field goal percentage and 21st in turnovers. Their shot selection and overall decision making is just not very good, and teams like that tend to fare poorly in the playoffs when the value of each possession becomes even more critical that it is during the regular season. 

This could and possibly should be a sweep, but I'll pencil Minnesota in for one win with Karl Anthony-Towns and/or Anthony Edwards erupting for 35-40 points. The Grizzlies will win in five games.

#3 Golden State (53-29) versus #6 Denver (48-34)

For the purposes of this preview, I will assume that Stephen Curry is available for the whole series and that he will score at least 23-25 ppg with a reasonable field goal percentage, and I will assume that Jamal Murray either cannot play or will miss at least part of the series while playing the rest of the series on some form of minutes restriction.

Nikola Jokic's career path is remarkable. I remember watching him during his rookie season and during the 2016 Olympics, when his talent was obvious--but who could have imagined that Jokic would emerge as a perennial MVP candidate? I liked his game a lot from the start, but I did not foresee this. When Jokic is on the court, the Nuggets are an elite team almost regardless of who else plays alongside of him, but when he is off of the court the Nuggets look like a Draft Lottery team. Unfortunately for the Nuggets, Jokic cannot play 48 mpg like Wilt Chamberlain used to do, and those non-Jokic minutes are going to be tough sledding against a very good Warriors team. The Warriors' ability to be dominant ended as soon as Kevin Durant got injured and then went to Brooklyn, but if Stephen Curry, Klay Thompson, and Draymond Green are healthy this is obviously a very dangerous team.

Jokic will be very productive, but for the first time since 2018 the Nuggets will not win a playoff series. Golden State will win in six games.

#4 Dallas (52-30) versus #5 Utah (49-33)

The Luka Doncic injury is obviously series-changing. It has been reported that he will miss at least the first game, it is not clear if he will be able to play at all, and it is likely that if he plays his mobility will be significantly hindered. Doncic has been superb during his first two playoff appearances, but even that was not enough to get the Mavericks past the first round, so it is difficult to see how the Mavericks can defeat the Jazz with Doncic at less than 100%.

The Jazz are a difficult team to read. This is their sixth straight playoff appearance under Coach Quin Snyder, yet they have not made it past the second round during his tenure. The Jazz rank in the top 10 in scoring, points allowed, field goal percentage, and defensive field goal percentage. With that type of efficiency and balance, one would expect them to fight for the number one seed, not slip to the fifth seed. They are building a reputation as a team that scores efficiently and defends well until the pressure ramps up, and then they collapse. Part of the problem is how much the Jazz rely on the three point shot; the Jazz ranked second in the league in three point field goals attempted, but only 11th in the league in three point field goal percentage. This high variance approach looks great when the shots are going down, but when a team that shoots a lot of three pointers hits a cold spell and does not have a backup plan then the results can be disastrous. The Jazz blow a lot of leads, and if they let a wounded Mavericks team hang around they could set themselves up for yet another playoff disappointment, but I predict that Utah will win in six games.      

-----

Thus, I expect the second round matchups to be Miami-Toronto, Boston-Milwaukee, Phoenix-Utah, and Memphis-Golden State.

The Heat and Raptors are two gritty, well-coached teams, but the Heat have more talent plus game seven at home (if necessary), so I expect the Heat to win a tough series in six games.

The Bucks' size and Antetokounmpo's greatness will be too much for the Celtics. Milwaukee will win in six games.

The Suns are a well-oiled machine, while the Jazz are a very good team that generally falls apart at some point during the playoffs. I expect the Suns to win in six games. 

The Grizzlies took out the Warriors at Golden State in last year's Play-In Tournament. The Warriors would no doubt like to avenge that loss, but even though the Warriors brought back Klay Thompson this season the Grizzlies have improved more than the Warriors since last season. The fiction that Stephen Curry is still the best point guard in the NBA will be exposed by Ja Morant in this series.

The Eastern Conference Finals matchup of Milwaukee versus Miami will mark the third straight year these teams met in the playoffs. Miami won in 2020 en route to reaching the NBA Finals, and Milwaukee beat Miami in 2021 en route to winning the NBA title. This time, the Bucks will prevail in six games.

Suns versus Grizzlies in the Western Conference Finals may be the best playoff series of 2022. I expect a seven game battle royale, with the Suns prevailing at home in game seven. I would not be surprised if the Grizzlies take an early lead in the series before the Suns bounce back; this will be a grueling series, and one injury or one key play could tip the balance. 

The concern for any team relying on Chris Paul is that he has a history of getting injured and/or wearing down as the playoffs progress--which happened last season, though the Suns overcame this to reach the NBA Finals--but the Suns have proven that they can win even without Paul. The Bucks demonstrated last year that they have what it takes to win a title--something that many critics openly doubted--and I predict that while LeBron James keeps talking about being the greatest of all-time Giannis Antetokounmpo will establish that he is, at the very least, the greatest of right now by leading Milwaukee to the 2022 NBA title. 

********************

Here is a summary of the results of my previous predictions both for playoff qualifiers and for the outcomes of playoff series:

In my 2021-2022 Eastern Conference Preview I correctly picked seven of this season's eight playoff teams and I went five for eight in my 2021-2022 Western Conference Preview. Here are my statistics for previous seasons:

2021: East 6/8, West 6/8
2020: East 7/8, West 6/8
2019: East 6/8, West 7/8
2018: East 6/8, West 6/8
2017: East 5/8, West 7/8
2016: East 5/8, West 6/8
2015: East 5/8, West 7/8
2014: East 6/8, West 6/8
2013: East 7/8, West 6/8
2012: East 8/8, West 7/8
2011: East 5/8, West 5/8
2010: East 6/8, West 7/8
2009: East 6/8, West 7/8
2008: East 5/8, West 7/8
2007: East 7/8, West 6/8
2006: East 6/8, West 6/8

That adds up to 103/136 in the East and 107/136 in the West for an overall accuracy rate of .772.

Here is my record in terms of picking the results of playoff series:

2021:  9/15
2020: 10/15
2019: 10/15
2018: 11/15
2017: 14/15
2016: 12/15
2015: 10/15
2014: 13/15
2013: 14/15
2012: 11/15
2011: 10/15
2010: 10/15
2009: 10/15
2008: 12/15
2007: 12/15
2006: 10/15
2005:  9/15

Total: 187/255 (.733)

At the end of each of my playoff previews I predict which teams will make it to the NBA Finals; in the past 17 years I have correctly picked 18 of the 34 NBA Finals participants. In five of those 17 years (including 2016 and 2017) I got both teams right and twice I got both teams right and predicted the correct result (2007, 2017). I correctly picked the NBA Champion before the playoffs began five times: 2007, 2013, 2017, 2018, 2021.

I track these results separately from the series by series predictions because a lot can change from the start of the playoffs to the NBA Finals, so my prediction right before the NBA Finals may differ from what I predicted when the playoffs began.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

posted by David Friedman @ 1:44 AM

2 comments

Thursday, April 14, 2022

Notes on the 2022 NBA Play-In Tournament

Four of the six 2022 NBA Play-In Tournament games are in the books (metaphorically--the league does not count the statistics from these games). The Brooklyn Nets earned a separate game recap because they are the only Play-In Tournament participant that has any chance to win even one playoff series; the other three Play-In Tournament games are summarized below.

On Tuesday night, the Minnesota Timberwolves defeated the L.A. Clippers 109-104, and the Timberwolves partied like it was a combination of "1999" (shout out to Minnesota native Prince), "One Shining Moment," and a celebration of a game seven victory in the NBA Finals. Patrick Beverley celebrated, cried, and trash-talked so much that inattentive viewers may have not noticed that he shot 2-8 from the field and 2-4 from the free throw line while posting a -5 plus/minus number. Although he grabbed a game-high 11 rebounds, his fury at the Clippers for not re-signing him betrays an almost delusional self-belief about his impact (Beverley averaged 9.2 ppg on .406 field goal shooting this season but he acts like he is the main reason that the Timberwolves snuck into the playoffs). I respect how Beverley has persevered from humble beginnings to overcome many challenges en route to becoming a rotation player in the NBA, but his act has become more than a little annoying. 

Karl Anthony-Towns is probably elated that Beverley attracted so much attention, because Karl Anthony-Towns--the self-proclaimed best shooting big man of all-time--shot 3-11 from the field, scored 11 points before fouling out, and stumbled to a team-worst -14 plus/minus number: the best thing that happened to the Timberwolves all night is that he fouled out, because the Timberwolves took over after he went to the bench. Anthony Edwards led the Timberwolves with 30 points, and D'Angelo Russell added 29 points. As Charles Barkley noted (in less charitable terms), the Timberwolves' shot selection is awful, and they won this game despite making many questionable decisions. Of course, you can survive bad decision making if the opposing team cannot put the ball in the hole; the Clippers shot just .436 from the field, and their two main scoring threats--Paul George (34 points) and Reggie Jackson (17 points) combined to shoot just 17-42 from the field (.405).

Last night, the Atlanta Hawks routed the Charlotte Hornets, 132-103. The Hawks are trying to salvage a disappointing season just one year after they made an improbable run to the Eastern Conference Finals, while the Hornets have not made the playoffs since 2016 and have not won a playoff series since 2002, four years before Michael Jordan bought a minority ownership stake and eight years before Jordan became the team's majority owner; as great as Jordan was as a player, he has found little success as either a basketball talent evaluator/executive or as a team owner.

In the first half, young point guards Trae Young and LaMelo Ball battled to see who could shoot worse, resulting in an inept tie as both shot 3-13 from the field. Young received more help from his teammates, and thus the Hawks led 60-52 at intermission. Young and Ball continued to misfire in the second half, and Young continued to receive more help from his teammates. Young finished with 24 points on 8-24 field goal shooting, while Ball had 26 points on 7-25 field goal shooting. The Hawks survived Young's bricklaying by shooting .521 from the field overall (.586 not counting Young). The Hornets shot just .378 from the field, and we can unofficially designate the Hornets as the worst franchise in the brief history of the Play-In Tournament; last year, the Hornets lost 144-117 to the Indiana Pacers, so the Hornets' lifetime Play-In Tournament plus/minus is -56.

In the second game of Wednesday's doubleheader, the New Orleans Pelicans built a 21 point lead, squandered most of it, and then righted the ship in time to beat the San Antonio Spurs, 113-103. The Pelicans shot .543 from the field, led by C.J. McCollum (32 points on 12-23 field goal shooting), Brandon Ingram (27 points on 11-19 field goal shooting), and Jonas Valanciunas (22 points on 9-14 field goal shooting). The Spurs shot just .407 from the field and they trailed by double digits for most of the second half. Devin Vassell led the Spurs with 23 points, while All-Star Dejounte Murray struggled (16 points, 5-19 field goal shooting).

On Friday night, the Cavaliers and Hawks will battle for the East's final playoff spot, while the Clippers-Pelicans game will determine who gets the West's last playoff berth. Two pretenders--the Hornets and the Spurs--have been sent home already, and it will be great to complete the playoff field so the postseason can begin.

Labels: , , , , ,

posted by David Friedman @ 12:44 AM

0 comments

Tuesday, April 12, 2022

Nets Clinch Seventh Seed After Outlasting Cavaliers, 115-108

The Brooklyn Nets kicked off the 2022 NBA Play-In Tournament by defeating the Cleveland Cavaliers 115-108 to clinch the seventh seed in the Eastern Conference playoffs. The Nets will face the Boston Celtics in a best of seven first round series, while the Cavaliers can still earn the eighth seed on Friday night by defeating the winner of tomorrow night's Atlanta-Charlotte game (the loser of that game will be eliminated from playoff contention). 

The Play-In Tournament exists in an alternate universe in which the statistics do not count and the games often are not competitive or memorable. At first, this game looked like it would follow that template, as Brooklyn led 40-20 after the first quarter while Kyrie Irving and Kevin Durant amassed gaudy numbers that, technically, do not exist. The Cavaliers are an injury-riddled team, but they are also gritty and well-coached; after falling behind 72-50 in the third quarter, they chiseled away until they cut the margin to six points (99-93) after an Evan Mobley dunk with 5:05 remaining in the fourth quarter. Durant answered with back to back jump shots, and even though the Cavaliers battled until the final buzzer they never again got closer than six points. 

The Nets led 57-43 at halftime after shooting .590 from the field, compared to .354 first half field goal shooting by Cleveland. The Cavaliers shot and played much better in the second half, but that kind of slow start is difficult to overcome; contrary to popular belief, the NBA is much more of a first quarter league than a fourth quarter league, as I explained during last year's Play-In Tournament: "The tone is often set in the first quarter, and that is also when the matchup advantages that will decide the game are often identified and probed."

Kyrie Irving scored a game-high 34 points on 12-15 field goal shooting, and he also had a game-high 12 assists. Irving scored 20 first half points on 9-9 field goal shooting, and he made his first 12 field goal attempts before missing his final three field goal attempts. Durant finished with 25 points on 9-16 field goal shooting, and he contributed 11 assists. Bruce Brown had a major impact with 18 points, nine rebounds, and eight assists. Darius Garland led the Cavaliers with 34 points on 13-24 field goal shooting, tying Irving for game-high scoring honors. Mobley added 19 points on 9-13 field goal shooting.

This game is likely a microcosm of what Brooklyn's playoff run will look like: the Nets have two sensational stars who can dominate with their precise shooting and deft passing, but the Nets lack depth, interior defensive presence, and a commitment to transition defense.

During last Sunday's Nets-Pacers telecast, Jeff Van Gundy lamented the poor transition defense of both teams, and he noted that people who say that NBA defenses should take away the three pointer first do not understand NBA analytics; he asserted that a defense's first priority should be to take away paint points, the second priority should be to give up as few free throws as possible, and then the third priority should be to guard the three point line. Van Gundy also quoted Hubie Brown, who often said (to players he coached, and during telecasts as a commentator), "If you are not on the board and you are not getting back on defense, where are you?"

The Nets dominated the Cavaliers at first, but then let the Cavaliers back into the game because the Nets lack the necessary defensive structure and continuity to maintain control throughout the game. Can Ben Simmons minimize those problems/weaknesses? Simmons has not played NBA basketball for almost a year, and it is not certain when he will be mentally and/or physically ready to play. If he is ready to play during the playoffs, it is not clear how many minutes he can handle, or how effective he can be during those minutes. His size, defense, and playmaking could make a difference if he can play 30-35 mpg while producing a line like 16-8-8 (his career regular season averages), but at this point it seems doubtful that we will see that Simmons during the 2022 playoffs.

The Nets are very dangerous against any team in a one game scenario, but they do not look like a team that will win a seven game series against an elite team.

Labels: , , , , , ,

posted by David Friedman @ 11:38 PM

4 comments

Monday, April 11, 2022

Wizards Have Yet to Reap Dividends From Westbrook Trade

There was much excitement about the Washington Wizards in some quarters early in the season--media members love to run with any narrative that even tangentially diminishes Russell Westbrook's value, such as asserting that the Wizards "won" the trade that sent Westbrook from the Wizards to the Lakers in exchange for Kyle Kuzma, Montrezl Harrell, and Kentavious Caldwell-Pope--but over the course of an 82 game season teams reveal who they really are, and the Wizards are who intelligent analysts thought they were: a team that is not very good, and a team that is not better than it was last season with Westbrook running the show.  

Kuzma, Harrell--who the Wizards sent to Charlotte in a midseason deal--and Caldwell-Pope proved to be so valuable to the Wizards that the Wizards went 35-47 to finish 12th in the 15 team Eastern Conference, eight games behind the 10th place finish required to qualify for the Play-In Tournament. Yes, Bradley Beal missed 42 games, but the Wizards were just 17-23 when he played.

Remember, the 2021 Wizards went 34-38, and then blew out the Indiana Pacers 142-115 in the Play-In Tournament to clinch the eighth seed. That was the first time the Wizards franchise won an elimination game since 1979. The Wizards even won a playoff game versus the number one seed Philadelphia 76ers.

The Wizards started just 7-17 during the 2021 season, but finished strongly, largely due to Westbrook's exceptional play. A major and underrated contribution that Westbrook provides is rebounding. Not only did Westbrook average a triple double in 2020-21 (22.2 ppg, 11.5 rpg, 11.7 apg) for the fourth time in five seasons--Oscar Robertson is the only other player in pro basketball history to average a triple double even once--but he ranked sixth in the NBA in rebounding. It is incorrect to assert that Westbrook pads his rebounding numbers and that if he were replaced with a different player there would not be any impact on team rebounding. Rebounds are not fungible, and it is unfortunate that many of the media members who demonstrate their bias and/or ignorance by bashing Westbrook vote for the NBA's official awards, including MVP and the All-NBA Team. During the 2020-21 season with Westbrook pounding the boards as a 6-3 point guard, the Wizards ranked eighth in the NBA in rebounding. This season, the Wizards plummeted to 23rd in the NBA in rebounding.

It will be very interesting to track the Wizards moving forward and see just how much value is provided by the players that they acquired in the Westbrook trade. The only time the Wizards made the playoffs in the past four years is the one season that Westbrook spent with the team.

Labels: , , , , ,

posted by David Friedman @ 8:17 PM

1 comments

The NBA is (Usually) Fantastic (Except When Teams Bench Their Starters for the Season's Last Game)

All 30 NBA teams played on Sunday, but several of them "competed" at less than full strength. For example, the Phoenix Suns, who had already clinched home court advantage throughout the NBA playoffs, rested all five of their starters, and lost 116-109 to the Sacramento Kings. The Miami Heat, who had already clinched home court advantage throughout the Eastern Conference playoffs, rested all of their starters except Duncan Robinson (who only played 20 minutes), and lost 125-111 to the Orlando Magic. 

Also, the Boston Celtics clinched the Eastern Conference's second seed after routing the Memphis Grizzlies, 139-110. The Grizzlies did not play any of their regular starters against Boston. Prior to Boston's win, the Milwaukee Bucks effectively conceded the second seed to Boston by not playing any of their regular starters in a 133-115 loss to the Cleveland Cavaliers--actually, one Bucks starter played for eight seconds: Jrue Holiday spent that much time on the court to receive credit for a game played (clinching a bonus of $306,000 based on playing in at least 67 games this season) before he committed an intentional foul and went to the bench, receiving high fives along the way. 

Holiday made much more money in those eight seconds than most Americans will ever make in a calendar year, and I think that when there is fan resentment about athletes' contracts this is not just about the amount of money that athletes make but also about the reality that athletes can get away with things that regular folks cannot do. How many of us can show up for work for eight seconds and not only receive credit for a full day's work but also get a bonus that--in theory--is supposed to encourage being available for a full day's work the majority of the time? Most of us understand and accept that athletes are paid a lot of money because they have special skills that are in high demand and that generate billions of dollars in revenue for the teams, the leagues, and the media outlets that cover their exploits, but when athletes are paid enormous sums for not playing that is when the customers become upset. Not only did Holiday get paid a lot to not play, but there are fans who paid a lot of money to see Holiday and other stars in person--and the same can be said for players such as Anthony Davis and Ben Simmons who receive tens of millions of dollars despite spending much--or, in Simmons' case, all--of the season getting paid to not play (exactly how much Simmons receives for sitting out this season will be the subject of arbitration).

I criticized Tony Dungy for shutting down his Indianapolis Colts after helping Reggie Wayne set a receiving record and I feel the same way about what Milwaukee Coach Mike Budenholzer did with Holiday and the Bucks. I often say that if you mess with the game then the game will mess with you. Dungy was by most accounts an excellent coach, but the only time he ever won a Super Bowl was the one year that he did not shut his team down at the end of the season. The Bucks had a very good 2021-22 season as the defending NBA champions, and it is beneath them to have healthy players sit out, particularly if this was done to manipulate the playoff seeding and avoid playing Brooklyn in the first round; the Bucks should leave that kind of nonsense to non-champions who lack confidence and think that they need to do shady things to win a title.

The large number of teams resting some or all of their regular starters is a bad look for the NBA for several reasons: 

1) Fans who paid full price for tickets were ripped off. For some fans, this may have been their only opportunity to see certain star players in person. Yes, when you buy a ticket there is a risk that a player may be injured, but there should not be a risk that healthy players just sit out.

2) The NBA, like most sports leagues, has become deeply intertwined with sports betting. Healthy players sitting out not only affect the outcome (and point spread) of one particular game, but can have implications for over/under propositions for season win totals, not to mention changing playoff matchups, and changing who has home court advantage in the playoffs.

3) When starting players sit, the quality of the overall product is diminished, and the meaningfulness of statistics is diluted: players who otherwise play very little or who don't even play at all get to rack up big scoring games or triple doubles or other numbers that prove little about those players' value but become part of the permanent statistical history of the league.

4) The perception is created that certain teams lost intentionally to alter playoff positioning. This is particularly notable regarding Milwaukee; last season, I praised the Bucks for not tanking or doing load management to avoid a playoff matchup with the Miami Heat, and karma proved to be on the Bucks' side as they not only beat the Heat but went on to win the NBA title. On Sunday, it sure looked like the Bucks did everything that they could do to avoid a first round matchup with the Brooklyn Nets, who seem on track to get the seventh seed. By losing, the Bucks dropped to third place and a much easier matchup with the sixth seeded Chicago Bulls. I have great respect for Giannis Antetokounmpo, but I do not respect what the Bucks did on Sunday, and I wonder if he supported what the Bucks did (I doubt that he would criticize Budenholzer publicly, but I wonder if deep down this sat well with Antetokounmpo). Charles Barkley made an interesting point: even if the Bucks are happy about getting their desired first round matchup, being the third seed means that they will not have home court advantage in the second round if things go according to form; resting their starters in game 82 may not look so smart if/when Milwaukee plays game seven of the second round in Boston.

It used to be a badge of honor to play all 82 games, or at least to play as many games as possible. I don't know if teams sat out players on Sunday to manipulate the standings, to try to avoid injuries, or for other reasons, but it is a shame that playing every game as hard as you can is no longer considered a worthy goal. Whether you look at big guys banging in the paint, "midsize" high flyers, or even tiny point guards, the legendary players of the past only missed games if they had legitimate injuries. Here are some examples: Wilt Chamberlain not only rarely missed a game--other than the 1969-70 season, when he tore up his knee but still returned in time to lead the L.A. Lakers to the NBA Finals--but he averaged a record 45.8 mpg during his career, meaning that he played nearly every minute in each game that he played. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar played all 82 games in five of his 20 seasons, and he played at least 80 games in 11 seasons. Julius Erving played all 84 games in four of his five ABA seasons, he played all 82 games in two NBA seasons, and he played at least 78 games in 10 of his 16 professional seasons. Michael Jordan played all 82 games in nine of his 14 full seasons (not counting his 17 game 1994-95 comeback), including 2002-03 when he was 39 years old. Karl Malone played all 82 games in 10 of his 19 seasons. John Stockton played all 82 games in 16 of his 19 seasons. Kobe Bryant battled many injuries during his career, yet he still played all 82 games in four of his 20 seasons, he played all 50 games in the lockout-shortened 1999 season, and he played at least 78 games in eight of his seasons. The NBA regular season MVP played in at least 81 games in 15 of the 16 seasons from 1967-82. Other than the anomaly of Bill Walton playing just 58 games in his 1978 MVP season, no MVP played fewer than 77 games from 1967-1992. 

The creation of the Play-In Tournament was supposed to disincentivize tanking games and resting players, but we are seeing that when organizations are determined to do such things they find ways to do so. The last day of the regular season was supposed to be dramatic and exciting with all 30 teams in action, but instead it had the feel and flavor of preseason even though playoff seeding was at stake: when teams just concede playoff seeding, why would fans be excited about such games?

The NBA's third Play-In Tournament begins on Tuesday night with the eighth seeded teams in each conference visiting the seventh seeded teams in each conference. The winners of those game will enter the playoffs as the seventh seeded teams, while the losers of those games will play the losers of the Wednesday games pitting the ninth seeded teams versus the tenth seeded teams; the losers of the Wednesday games are eliminated, while the winners of the second Play-In Tournament games will receive the eighth seeds.

Here are my Play-In Tournament predictions:

1) The Brooklyn Nets defeat the Cleveland Cavaliers on Tuesday to claim the Eastern Conference's seventh seed.

2) The L.A. Clippers defeat the Minnesota Timberwolves on Tuesday to claim the Western Conference's seventh seed.

3) The Atlanta Hawks defeat the Charlotte Hornets on Wednesday, and the New Orleans Pelicans defeat the San Antonio Spurs on Wednesday.

4) The Atlanta Hawks defeat the Cleveland Cavaliers on Friday to claim the Eastern Conference's eighth seed, and the Minnesota Timberwolves defeat the New Orleans Pelicans to claim the Western Conference's eighth seed.

Barring injuries, suspensions, or some other unexpected development, Brooklyn is the only Play-In Tournament team that has a realistic chance of winning a playoff series.

I have already explained why I am not a fan of the Play-In Tournament. I will watch the games because I am a dedicated NBA fan/analyst, but I am much more interested in the playoffs than in games that the NBA does not take seriously as anything other than a way to generate more TV revenue, more ticketing revenue, and (presumably) more marketing revenue. NBA Play-In Tournament statistics do not count as either regular season statistics or playoff statistics, so Jayson Tatum's 50 point game and LeBron James' triple double during the 2021 Play-In Tournament never happened officially (if LeBron James' body gives out when he is just a few points away from Kareem Abdul-Jabbar's regular season scoring record, maybe the NBA will retroactively count James' Play-In Tournament points as regular season points).

The NBA seems to consider the Play-In Tournament to be a big success, but I wonder how the league will feel if the Nets lose on buzzer beaters on both Tuesday and Friday, resulting in the playoffs featuring a limited and/or injury-riddled team with no chance of advancing as opposed to featuring a team led by former NBA champions Kevin Durant and Kyrie Irving. Such a scenario may not happen this year, but if the NBA makes the Play-In Tournament a permanent fixture (which seems to already be the case) then it will happen someday, and the playoffs will be less compelling as a result. Other than fans of the Cavaliers and any other team that may face the Nets this week, NBA fans are hoping to see the Nets face off against the Celtics in the first round.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

posted by David Friedman @ 11:30 AM

8 comments