The Evolution of Cleveland's Roster Since 2007
The Cleveland Cavaliers advanced to the NBA Finals in 2007 but GM Danny Ferry did not rest on his laurels; instead, he traded away starters Drew Gooden and Larry Hughes plus reserves Donyell Marshall and Shannon Brown in exchange for Ben Wallace and Joe Smith. That move made the Cavs older but added frontcourt depth and versatility. Holdouts by Anderson Varejao and Sasha Pavlovic--and Pavlovic's subsequent injuries--prevented the Cavs from completely jelling in 2008 but they still pushed the eventual champion Boston Celtics to seven games in the playoffs. Ferry then acquired point guard Mo Williams and the Cavs raced to the best record in the NBA in 2009, only to fall to the Orlando Magic in the Eastern Conference Finals. Ferry promptly reloaded for the 2010 season by acquiring Shaquille O'Neal and Anthony Parker, while signing an offer sheet for restricted free agent Jamario Moon (the Miami Heat still have the opportunity to match that offer and retain Moon).
In my newest CavsNews article, I examine just how much Ferry has upgraded Cleveland's roster in the past two years (6/19/15 edit: the link to CavsNews.com no longer works, so I have posted the original article below):
In 2007, the Cavaliers surprised many
pundits—but not this
writer—by making it to the NBA Finals, where a veteran San Antonio Spurs
team promptly swept them. The Cavs had perhaps reached the championship round
“a year early,” but rather than stand pat to see if that group could return to
the Finals, General Manager Danny Ferry soon blew up the roster, adding more
depth and versatility. Injuries and holdouts prevented the Cavs from completely
jelling in 2008 but the new unit--buoyed by the addition of Mo Williams—posted
the best record in the NBA in 2009 and advanced to the Eastern Conference
Finals.
True to form, this summer Ferry has again
made aggressive moves to strengthen the roster, acquiring Shaquille O’Neal and
Anthony Parker while discarding Ben Wallace and Sasha Pavlovic. Joe Smith and
Wally Szczerbiak are not certain to be back; youngsters J.J. Hickson, Tarence
Kinsey and Darnell Jackson could work their way into the rotation and/or Ferry
may yet make additional trades/free agent signings.
Now is a good time to take a detailed
look at exactly how significantly Ferry has changed Cleveland’s roster since the team’s 2007 trip
to the NBA Finals.
Here are the top 10 players in Cleveland’s playoff
rotation from the past three years (based on mpg):
2007
Playoffs
LeBron James 44.7 mpg
Larry Hughes 35.5 mpg
Zydrunas Ilgauskas 32.5 mpg
Sasha Pavlovic 30.8 mpg
Drew Gooden 30.3 mpg
Anderson Varejao 22.4 mpg
Daniel Gibson 20.1 mpg
Eric Snow 12.8 mpg
Damon Jones 12.6 mpg
Donyell Marshall 10.7 mpg
2008
Playoffs
LeBron James 42.5 mpg
Delonte West 34.8 mpg
Zydrunas Ilgauskas 30.2 mpg
Wally Szczerbiak 28.8 mpg
Daniel Gibson 25.8 mpg
Ben Wallace 23.4 mpg
Joe Smith 20.2 mpg
Anderson Varejao 18.5 mpg
Sasha Pavlovic 13.9 mpg
Devin Brown 11.5 mpg
2009
Playoffs
Delonte West 42.2 mpg
LeBron James 41.4 mpg
Mo Williams 38.6 mpg
Anderson Varejao 30.0 mpg
Zydrunas Ilgauskas 29.1 mpg
Joe Smith 16.7 mpg
Wally Szczerbiak 12.8 mpg
Ben Wallace 12.6 mpg
Daniel Gibson 12.3 mpg
Sasha Pavlovic 8.3 mpg
Cleveland’s increased depth has enabled the
coaching staff to give more rest to LeBron James, whose playoff mpg decreased
from a team-high 44.7 mpg in the 2007 playoffs to 42.5 mpg in the 2008 playoffs
to 41.4 mpg in last season’s playoffs, when James ranked second to Delonte
West. Starting center Zydrunas Ilgauskas has also seen his minutes decline
slightly as forward/center Anderson Varejao assumed a much more significant
role. Daniel Gibson made a name for himself with his clutch shooting in 2007
and moved up to fifth in playoff mpg in 2008, but injuries—and the addition of
Mo Williams--limited Gibson to just 12.3 mpg in the 2009 playoffs. James,
Ilgauskas, Varejao and Gibson are the only players who ranked in the top ten in
playoff mpg for the Cavs each of the past three seasons.
Larry Hughes was James’ “sidekick” in
2007, first playing shooting guard and then shifting to point guard so that Sasha
Pavlovic could start at shooting guard. When injuries sidelined Hughes in the
last two games of the Finals, Gibson started at point guard. Just two years
later, both Hughes and Pavlovic are no longer on the roster and Delonte West is
firmly entrenched as the starting shooting guard.
One obvious indicator of just how much
depth Ferry has added to the roster is that Pavlovic and Gibson combined to
average more than 50 mpg for the 2007 Finalists but barely played 20 mpg in
last year’s playoffs. The 2007 and 2008 teams did not have a legitimate, top
flight point guard, but the 2009 squad featured Mo Williams, who earned his
first All-Star selection; Williams may not be a prototypical pass first point
guard but—unlike Hughes—Williams is not playing out of position and he is a
much better long range shooter than Hughes.
Three of the top six players from the
2007 playoff rotation—including Hughes plus two players who started in the
Finals, Pavlovic and Gooden—are no longer on the team; in 2009, their roles
were filled by Williams, West and Varejao. The signing of free agent Anthony
Parker means that the Cavs are deeper than ever on the perimeter, as Williams,
West and Parker are all proven shooters. West and Parker are also good
defenders, while Williams—who was not previously known for his defense—earned
raves from the coaching staff last year for his work at that end of the court.
The Cavs’ three man rotation of bigs
changed from Ilgauskas-Gooden-Varejao in 2007 to Ilgauskas-Wallace-Smith in
2008 to Varejao-Ilgauskas-Smith in 2009. With the addition of Shaquille O’Neal
this summer, Cleveland’s
new three man rotation of bigs will be O’Neal-Ilgauskas-Varejao. The talent
upgrade since 2007 is clearly evident: O’Neal will have more of an impact than
Gooden did and Varejao is a better player now than he was in 2007, while
Ilgauskas has remained consistently productive for the past several years. The
only cautionary note regarding the frontcourt is that under Ferry’s watch this
group is getting older (Ilgauskas-Gooden-Varejao had an average age of just
under 27 in 2007, while O’Neal-Ilgauskas-Varejao have an average age of more
than 32); it remains to be seen if Ferry will be able to draft/acquire/develop
adequate younger replacements for O’Neal and Ilgauskas.
During last year’s playoffs, TNT
commentator Mike Fratello noted that the Cavs had at least 10 players on their
roster who had been starters for playoff teams at one point in their careers.
That statement is still true now but the current Cavs team matches up better—at
least on paper—with the league’s other top contenders such as the Lakers, Magic
and Celtics. If Ferry succeeds in prying restricted free agent Jamario Moon
away from the Miami Heat, then the Cavs will add yet another player to the mix
who has started for a playoff team and has the length and athletic ability to
defend top notch wing players.
Labels: Cleveland Cavaliers, Danny Ferry, LeBron James, Shaquille O'Neal
posted by David Friedman @ 1:26 AM


Cavs Build 29 Point Lead, Coast to 94-82 Win Over Pistons
The Cleveland Cavaliers used a powerful three pronged offensive attack led by LeBron James plus stifling defense to race to a 29 point lead versus the sputtering Detroit Pistons en route to a 94-82 victory, placing Detroit in a 2-0 hole. James finished with game-high totals in points (29) and rebounds (13), adding six assists while committing only two turnovers. He thrilled the crowd with two sensational third quarter dunks: a two handed monster jam off of a slick bounce pass from Mo Williams at the 5:19 mark to put the Cavs up 61-44 and a two handed windmill fastbreak dunk that made the score 68-46 Cleveland with 3:27 left. Williams established playoff career-highs in points (21) and assists (seven), while Delonte West had 20 points and four assists, though he did commit a game-high five turnovers.
Richard Hamilton led Detroit with 17 points. Antonio McDyess grabbed a team-high 11 rebounds but only scored eight points on 3-9 shooting. Kwame Brown had the most interesting stat line of the night, accumulating more fouls (five) than points (zero) and rebounds (three) combined. The Cavs outrebounded the Pistons 43-34 and held them to .395 field goal shooting (32-81), though Cleveland only shot .424 from the field (28-66), a low percentage largely due to a 1-11 outing by Cleveland's reserves.
It would not seem like there could be much drama in such a game--many writers headed to the media room after the third quarter to get a head start on their game stories and some of the fans behind the media section asked me if I could switch one of the TV monitors to the channel featuring the Cleveland Indians game--but when James and the starters went to the bench in the fourth quarter the Pistons suddenly roared to life and cut the lead to 82-68 with 7:15 remaining. Even after James, Mo Williams and Anderson Varejao rode in like the cavalry to try to save the day, the Pistons continued their rally, narrowing the gap to 84-77 at the 3:51 mark. Then the Cavs got three straight stops and James, West and Williams each made a pair of free throws to reestablish control of the game. After another Cavs stop, James grabbed the rebound and fired a perfect outlet pass to Williams, who scored a layup and got fouled. Williams missed the free throw but the Cavs enjoyed a 92-77 lead with just 2:19 remaining, so the outcome was no longer in doubt.
The Cavs opened the game with a 10-2 run and never trailed. A 23-14 first quarter lead expanded to 46-32 by halftime, 77-50 after three quarters and 79-50 early in the fourth quarter. TNT's Kenny Smith has said several times that he believes that the playoff experience of Detroit's veterans actually works against the Pistons in this series because those guys have seen enough postseason action to understand quite clearly that their team has no chance to beat Cleveland in a seven game series; Smith thinks that this explains the lackluster way that the starters are performing and maybe he has a point, because Detroit's young reserves entered the game in the fourth quarter and played their hearts out, continuing to gain ground even for a few minutes after Cleveland's starters returned to the fray. Naturally, this is a sensitive issue for Detroit and after the game when Hamilton was asked about why the starters played so sluggishly compared to the reserves he deftly deflected that question by focusing his response on how well Detroit's second unit played: "I thought the bench did a great job. I thought they came in the fourth quarter and did a lot of things that our starters didn't do. They talked. They were on a string (defensively); when one guy got beat, another guy was there. Rotations were good."
Detroit Coach Michael Curry thought that the reserves set an example that the starters should follow during the rest of the series: "I think with the second group it showed it doesn't matter what we do coverage-wise. If you go out, execute it and do it extremely hard, we'll be okay. We cover a lot of ground. We showed on the pick and rolls. We trapped. They brought LeBron back in, we trapped, rotated, covered the shooters. Physically we were able to get it done and rebound the basketball as well. That's what we take from it--things we are trying to do and the things we are talking about doing going into the game, we can do it."
Not surprisingly, Cleveland Coach Mike Brown--who received the Red Auerbach Trophy (and a much deserved standing ovation from the sellout crowd of 20,562) prior to the game in honor of winning the 2009 Coach of the Year Award--preferred to focus his postgame remarks on the first three quarters of the game: "I thought our guys played a great three quarters of basketball. First, second and third quarters we were very good on both ends of the floor. I thought we moved the ball well in terms of ball reversals. We threw the ball ahead, trying to get some easy baskets. I thought we set screens for one another. I thought we spaced the floor very well. I thought, offensively, all of our staples were there. That was great to see, fun to watch. Defensively, I thought we did things terrific, too, in the first three quarters. We shrunk the floor; we made that paint look crowded. We didn't give up a ton of middle drives. We contested shots. We kept them off the glass. We did a lot of good things in the first three quarters basketball-wise. In the fourth quarter, offensively their second or third unit, however you want to call it, did a great job. You have to give them credit. They got up into us and we didn't respond well with the guys we had on the floor, so we had to go back to our starters to close the game, which they did a terrific job of doing."
One of the most remarkable things about James is the poise that he maintains on and off the court. He does not overreact to anything and when he was asked after the game about the poor performance of Cleveland's bench players he struck just the right tone: "We did a great job offensively and defensively and we played great basketball for the first three quarters. I think that in the fourth quarter we just got a little content, which we cannot do in the playoffs. We cannot allow ourselves to get content...As starters or as guys, we are all a team, so we had no problem going back in and finishing out the game. We all win together and we all lose together. We all play well together and sometimes we don't play well together, so there is no blame for anybody. The biggest thing is that we got a win but we know that we cannot allow ourselves to not close out a game the right way."
*****************************
Notes From Courtside:
Prior to the game, I had the opportunity to interview Cavs General Manager Danny Ferry. This season, I have asked both Cavs Coach
Mike Brown and Spurs Coach
Gregg Popovich to give their thoughts about the February 13, 2009
New York Times article that described how Houston General Manager Daryl Morey uses statistics to make player evaluations. The article focuses on Morey's acquisition of Shane Battier, though the author neglected to mention that the Rockets gave up a very promising young player (Rudy Gay) in order to get Battier.
Brown and Popovich both indicated very strongly to me that they are not "numbers guys." Ferry has a reputation of being at least somewhat a "numbers guy" and it has been reported that well respected "stat guru" Dan Rosenbaum has been advising the Cavs since the start of the 2005-06 season.
Friedman: "Did you have a chance to read the
New York Times article about the use of advanced statistics to analyze basketball?"
Ferry: "Yes."
Friedman: "What did you think of that article in general? How much do you use advanced statistics?"
Ferry: "I read the article. I thought that it was a good article. I believe in using statistical analysis as part of your decision making process. Every team will look at things and do things differently based off of how they read the stats but I think it definitely has a place in studying the draft and it definitely has a place in studying in free agency and it has a place in getting ready for games."
Friedman: "You've been in the NBA a long time first as a player, then in the Spurs front office and now with the Cavs. How much has the use of statistics--and the sophistication of the statistics being used--increased during the period of time that you have been in the NBA?"
Ferry: "I think it has increased dramatically, over the past five years in particular. I think that owners, general managers and teams in general have looked at what baseball has done (with statistics) and know, obviously, that they can't recreate baseball--it's a different game with a different set up and a different structure and you look at the statistics differently--but it challenges you to think a little more analytically about the decision making process."
Friedman: "One thing that could be said to be different about baseball and basketball is that baseball is a station to station game--the pitcher throws the ball, the hitter hits it, the fielder fields it and each thing is a discrete action that can be evaluated--while in a basketball game you have 10 players in motion at once. Do you think that difference makes it more challenging to come up with accurate metrics for basketball than it is for baseball?"
Ferry: "I think that you can get accurate metrics for basketball but you also have to understand that it is a static thing and that whether it is baseball, whether it is football or anything, to just make decisions off of statistics would be a mistake but it can be an important part of the equation in basketball. I believe it can be."
Friedman: "If you are looking at either your team or at an opposing team, are there certain statistics that you consider to be very reliable to say that a given team is performing efficiently? For instance, are there numbers that you zero in on and say that if a team is doing well at this then I know that they are good defensively or that they are good offensively?"
Ferry: "You can look at points per possession, you can look at pace of play. There are a lot of different numbers--plus/minus statistics for players, adjusted plus/minus statistics for players, rebound rates. There are all different kinds of things that you can look at from a team standpoint and also from an individual player standpoint."
Friedman: "Are there certain particular stats you focus on from a team standpoint? Individual stats were going to be my next question. Are there certain team stats that you value over the others?"
Ferry: "Probably the one that we look at the most is just regular old defensive field goal percentage, because that is something the guys all see. It is also something that a statistics person would look at, beat it up and say that we are crazy to look at it but for us it is something that we can see that is right in front of our eyes and that our coaching staff is very comfortable using. Now, do we have other layers on top of that that we look at behind the scenes? Yes."
Friedman: "Can you describe--"
Ferry: "No."
Friedman (laughs): "OK, I had to ask, but I understand if you can't. From an individual player standpoint, obviously you expect different things from players at different positions--a point guard has different responsibilities than a center and so forth--but when you are evaluating players in a general sense, you mentioned plus/minus before, is there a metric that you look at that you think gives you a good gauge in general on players?"
Ferry: "Yes."
Friedman: "And again you can't say which one?"
Ferry: "No."
Friedman: "OK, I understand."
Ferry: "I don't want everybody to know how I look at things, necessarily. Other people may look at things differently."
Friedman: "I have asked the same or similar questions to Coach Brown and Coach Popovich. Coach Brown said to me that he is not really a big stat guy, that he goes more by feel. Coach Popovich said the same thing. Obviously, you already know this because you have dealt with both of them a lot longer than I have but I am just indicating what my research has been. On that continuum, are you more of a stat guy than they are?"
Ferry: "I am more interested in statistical analysis than Pop and Mike but that is not saying a whole lot."
Friedman: "Well, that is interesting because it may have a different value to you than to them. Your angle has more to do with player evaluation, while they are coaching and dealing with what is going on during games. Those things are not exactly the same, although they can overlap."
Ferry: "No, but I will look at how we are playing and what we are doing as a team as well. I like looking at statistical analysis things whether I am looking at our team or looking at other teams or looking at free agents. There is a place for it but it is only a small part of the equation."
Ferry also clarified for me something that Brown and Popovich had both mentioned about P.J. Carlesimo, who looks at stats much more than they do; Ferry explained that Carlesimo--who wa an assistant coach with Brown on Popovich's staff several years ago--relies mainly on traditional boxscore statistics, such as fast break points, as opposed to the newer, "advanced" stats, so the input that Carlesimo offered in that regard would not have been of interest to either the new wave stat guys nor to coaches like Brown and Popovich who rely more on feel than they do on new or old stats. Hopefully at some point I will have an opportunity to speak with Carlesimo not only about this subject but also about why he chose to play Kevin Durant at shooting guard instead of small forward, a decision that Scott Brooks reversed (with tremendously positive results) as soon as he took over for Carlesimo as Oklahoma City's head coach.
I mentioned to Ferry that I think that he has done an excellent job of making the Cavs arguably the deepest team in the league, one of the few teams that truly has a full complement of shooters, rebounders, defenders and passers, with reserve players being more than capable of stepping in if someone gets hurt or is in foul trouble. When I said this to Ferry, I focused on the 10 man rotation and while he appreciated the compliment he made the point that in addition to those players he really likes players 11-15, particularly 24 year old Tarence Kinsey, a very talented guard who only averaged 5.5 mpg this season. Although the bench players did not play well in game two versus Detroit, they have been a real strength for the Cavs throughout the season, enabling James to completely sit out more than a dozen fourth quarters as they protected/expanded leads.
***
During Coach Curry's pregame standup he made some interesting comments about defending LeBron James, his experiences as a first year coach, what went wrong with the Pistons this season and what kind of team he is trying to build.
Regarding the critique that the Pistons are supposedly not defending James as well as they did in the 2007 playoffs, Curry said, "I was doing interviews yesterday and I laughed when everyone said that we are a different Detroit team than we were two years ago as far as how we defended LeBron. I had to go back and check the records: I thought we lost that series--with home court advantage--in game six, so we want to do some things better than we did in 2007."
I asked Coach Curry, "What has been the most unexpected challenge for you as a first year coach? What is something that happened in the course of the season that--as much as you prepared to be a coach--was an unexpected challenge that you faced?"
Curry replied, "Changing the team right at the beginning of the year. It was kind of tough with the point guard but, really, just the fact that we had Allen (Iverson) and Rip (Richard Hamilton) both being really established shooting guards--trying to play them together was so-so but never was great. Trying to play each one of them in a supportive role off of the bench didn't work out either. So I didn't expect that. Everything else you try to prepare for the unexpected. As I said before back in Detroit (prior to game one on Saturday), I think that everything we've tried to do this year, if he had had Dice (Antonio McDyess) the entire time it would have been better--it still was going to be tough but we really got to see the value of having someone like Antonio McDyess on your team."
I then asked, "Do you think that was the biggest factor in why your record was not as good this year, not having McDyess at the start of the season and then trying to bring him back into the fold while all of the other things you mentioned were going on?"
Curry answered, "We just didn't play good. Our record is how we played; we didn't play good enough. I just think when you talk about the biggest things we went through during the year, I'm saying that having McDyess (the whole time) could have helped the transition or with the trade that was made but I'm not using that as an excuse. Our record is what it is because that is how we played."
Curry commendably is not looking for any excuses for his team's performance but anyone who understands basketball realizes that when a team is without its leading rebounder for more than a fifth of the season that is a critical blow, particularly with so much other turmoil also happening. McDyess is also valuable offensively because of his shooting touch, plus he is probably the most respected voice in the locker room among the players.
Just like Utah Coach Jerry Sloan is frustrated that his team does not mirror the aggressive mindset that he had as a player, Curry is disappointed that his Pistons do not play the way that he did: "One thing that I've realized as a coach is--some of the things I did as a player, I'm proud of how I played the game, but trying to mold the team into performing the way that I did takes a little longer than I expected. I think that you have to have more players who play that way. Maybe over time we will add players to the mix and defend that way...I gave my body up more as a player...I took more charges, I dove for more loose balls, I gave more hard fouls. Those are things that as I continue to mold my team going forward that I want to be our signature."
***
Before the game, Coach Brown said that LeBron James has always played with effort on defense but that unlike Michael Jordan--who played at North Carolina for three years under the tutelage of the legendary Dean Smith--James had to make the transition from high school straight to the NBA and that was a steep learning curve for the young Cavs star.
Brown also explained how Cleveland's previous playoff experience is helpful during this postseason: "Having patience but playing with a sense of urgency is something that we have developed over the past few years."
During his pregame standup, someone asked James if his initial adjustment to the NBA was tougher on offense or on defense and he replied without hesitation, "Defense. You can get away with cheating plays and not playing defense in high school sometimes because the guys physically or athletically are not better than you, so you can get away with it. Here there are guys who are equally fast and equally strong." He later added that defense "means more to me now at this point in my career than it did to me in the past. Not to say that I just didn't care about defense but now I care as much about defense as I do about offense." He dismissed the idea that playing for Team USA spurred that change in his thought process--though Doug Collins and other observers believe that playing alongside veterans like Kobe Bryant and Jason Kidd helped James become more focused on defense--instead crediting Coach Mike Brown's schemes plus his own intrinsic desire to improve. James said that each offseason he focuses on a specific goal and that his goal prior to his season was to win the Defensive Player of the Year award; earlier on Tuesday it was announced that Dwight Howard had become the youngest winner in the history of that award, with James finishing second. James did not receive a single DPoY vote last year.
***
Before the game I spoke briefly with Pistons broadcaster Greg Kelser, who won an NCAA title at Michigan State with Magic Johnson before averaging 9.7 ppg in a six season NBA career that was shortened by injuries. When I interviewed Kelser a while ago for an
article about him that first ran in the May 2007 issue of
Basketball Times, he told me that he thought he could still get 10 rebounds in a game. When I reminded him about that statement, he laughed and said since he is a few years older now he probably could only get eight rebounds.
Labels: Antonio McDyess, Cleveland Cavaliers, Danny Ferry, Delonte West, Detroit Pistons, LeBron James, Mike Brown, Mo Williams, Richard Hamilton
posted by David Friedman @ 9:32 AM


Cleveland Rolls the Dice
Generally, teams that make it to the NBA Finals do not make wholesale changes in the middle of the following season. Cleveland General Manager Danny Ferry is certainly taking a risk by trading two starters and six players overall from a roster that came within four wins of capturing an NBA title last June.
Before this season started, some so-called experts predicted that the Cavaliers might not even make the playoffs and said that Cleveland's run to the 2007 NBA Finals was a fluke. I maintained that the formula of good defense and rebounding combined with the brilliance of LeBron James would once again put the Cavaliers in contention for the Eastern Conference crown. Of course, I had no way of knowing that Anderson Varejao and Sasha Pavlovic would both miss the start of the season due to contract holdouts or that James, Varejao, Pavlovic and other key rotation players would miss many games due to injuries. Still, despite those challenges the Cavs remain squarely in the hunt for home court advantage in the first round of the Eastern Conference playoffs. Will Ferry's bold move prove to be the final step in the process of building a championship team or will the Cavaliers actually be a worse team once the dust settles? I discuss that question in my newest article for CavsNews.com (6/17/15 edit: the link to CavsNews.com no longer works, so I have posted the original article below):
At literally
the last minute before the trade deadline, Cleveland General Manager Danny
Ferry decided to get rid of half of his active roster, shipping out Larry Hughes,
Drew Gooden, Donyell Marshall, Ira Newble, Shannon Brown and Cedric Simmons in
a three way trade with Chicago and Seattle that brought Ben Wallace, Joe Smith,
Wally Szczerbiak and Delonte West to Cleveland. Normally, a team that wins a
conference championship does not make such a huge trade midway through the next
season; teams need a certain amount of time to develop enough continuity to
perform well in the playoffs. However, the majority of the contending teams
have made significant offseason and/or in season moves, so most of them will be
developing their team chemistry and continuity on the fly.
The Cavaliers
are coming off of the best postseason performance in franchise history and are
right in the thick of the Eastern Conference playoff race this season despite
battling injuries and having to overcome lengthy holdouts by Anderson Varejao
and Sasha Pavlovic. One might think that there would be a positive vibe around
the Cavaliers but that has not been the case for most of the season. LeBron
James openly lobbied for the team to acquire Jason Kidd, vowing that this move
would be all it would take to bring a championship to Cleveland. Cavalier fans roundly booed Larry
Hughes every time he shot the ball and urged the team to trade him,
disregarding the fact that the team’s record has consistently been much better
with him in the lineup than it is when he is sidelined.
Ferry offered
a very simple and direct explanation for his actions: “I didn't think we were
good enough to win the championship. I thought we had a very good team. But I
do believe if we have a chance to make ourselves better we should try. Was it a
risk in doing so? Yes, it was a risk. But we're going to have to make some
decisions that have some risk in them if we want to continue to build and
grow."
There is an
old saying to the effect that if a coach listens to what the fans in the stands
are shouting he will soon be sitting next to them. The same reasoning can be
applied to general managers. Another saying is "Be careful what you wish
for--you might get it." Fans have been pleading with Ferry to get rid of
Hughes and now they have gotten their wish. What puzzles me most about this
trade is that, in the best case scenario, I think that it only makes Cleveland
a little better—and it is certainly possible that it will make Cleveland worse.
Let’s look at
the best case scenario first: Wallace rebounds and defends like he did two
years ago (or even during last year’s playoffs), Smith reliably drains midrange
jumpers, Szczerbiak spreads the floor on offense by consistently making three
pointers and West solidifies the point guard position. If all of those things
happen then the Cavs will be a little better than they were previously—but not
much better. Don’t forget that Gooden and Hughes started for a team that won 50
games last year, defeated the vaunted Detroit Pistons four straight times in
the Eastern Conference Finals and, when at full strength, was on pace to win at
least 50 games this year. The newly minted Cavs are certainly a 50 win caliber
team but are they a 60 win caliber team? If not, then at best they are only
marginally better than they were before Ferry pulled the trigger on this deal.
The worst
case scenario mainly involves questions about team chemistry, effort and
perimeter defense. Regardless of what one may think of each of the individual
players who the Cavs dealt away, collectively they played well enough to help
the team make it all the way to the NBA Finals. There are serious questions
about how much effort Wallace has put forth since he received his big contract
and there are also some concerns about his impact on team chemistry. While the
Pistons have clearly missed Wallace’s shotblocking and intensity since letting
him go to Chicago,
Wallace was not willing or able to bring a high level of energy to the Bulls on
a nightly basis. Hughes was able to defend three positions, while Szczerbiak
will be a defensive liability regardless of whether he matches up with small
forwards or shooting guards (there is of course no way that he can defend any
point guards). The Zydrunas Ilgauskas-Drew Gooden-Anderson Varejao frontcourt
rotation—with cameo appearances by Donyell Marshall—had a nice blend of size,
shooting skills, rebounding and the ability to play screen/roll with James.
Wallace and Smith are talented individuals but it is not clear that their skill
sets will blend smoothly with how the Cavaliers play. For instance, Wallace and
Varejao probably cannot play together because then the frontcourt will not have
enough scoring punch.
Cleveland’s recipe for success under Coach Mike
Brown is defense, rebounding and the brilliance of LeBron James. The numbers
show that Cleveland’s
defense has slipped a bit this year, particularly in field goal percentage
allowed and point differential, but one could argue that the absence of Varejao
for a major portion of the season had a lot to do with that. If Wallace does
not give a good effort on a nightly basis then the Cavs could very well be
worse defensively now than they were before the trade; with the previous group,
there was at least the hope—based on last year’s performance—that once the team
got healthy they would again play good defense.
James tried his best to sound
enthusiastic about Ferry’s bold move and even actually said, “I’m excited,” but
when he elaborated he hardly sounded excited: “This isn't the type of deal I
expected. You guys heard what I wanted but I am grateful for the situation. We
got some good caliber guys that are coming in. It was very surprising, you come
into the locker room today and it is very different. We've added some depth to
our front line, which we needed, and we added some more shooting, which we
needed. We don't have much time, but what is good about the guys that came in
is that they have playoff experience."
Contrast that with what James
said in the wake of his All-Star MVP performance on Sunday: “We (the Cavaliers)
know we're still not going to get the respect we should get. That's never been
a problem for us. We don't care. We just go out and play. We're always going to
be (perceived as) the third or fourth or fifth best team in the Eastern
Conference. You know, we still go out there and win ballgames and we know when
the postseason happens, you know, you've got to come get it from us, because
we're very good.” As much as James hoped to be able to play alongside Kidd, he
also knew that he could at least get to the Finals with the previous group.
Less than a month ago, I asked "Is the Status Quo Really So Bad for the Cavs?" Here is how I answered
that question:
The bottom line is that if this Cleveland
Cavaliers team stays healthy there is no reason that they cannot return to the
NBA Finals. It would not be wise to tinker with the roster unless it is clear
that the move markedly improves the team’s chances to make it to the Finals
and/or beat the Western Conference representative. Adding players for the sake
of having name brand talent does not automatically produce success—just ask the
New York Knicks or the turn of the century Portland Trailblazers.
Cleveland
has acquired "name brand talent"--two former All-Stars (Wallace and
Szczerbiak) and a former number one overall draft pick (Smith)--but only in the
playoffs will we find out if the roster has truly been upgraded. Labels: Cleveland Cavaliers, Danny Ferry, LeBron James
posted by David Friedman @ 1:01 PM

